Jun 6, 2013
JUNE 6, 2013 · 2:20 PM
“Philadelphia Abortion Doctor Guilty of Murder” – Boston Globe
Below is an article by the Brady Dennis on the Doctor who was guilty of murder.
Here is the article clip:
Here is the text followed by a link to the article:
The way those brief lives ended didn’t amount to abortion but to three acts of first-degree murder, jurors concluded.
Gosnell, in a dark suit and a maroon shirt, furrowed his brow and shook his head slightly but remained stoic when the verdicts were read in a packed Philadelphia courtroom. One juror appeared to cry. Prosecutors smiled in relief and hugged colleagues.
Jurors acquitted Gosnell of third-degree murder but found him guilty on a lesser charge of involuntary manslaughter in the 2009 death of 41-year-old Karnamaya Mongar of Virginia, who died from a drug overdose while undergoing an abortion at his clinic.
The trial will move next week into a sentencing phase, when the jurors will be called back to decide whether Gosnell, 72, should receive the death penalty or life in prison. Prosecutors intend to seek the death penalty, and the multiple murder convictions are likely to bolster their argument.
Neither prosecutors nor jurors were available for comment after the verdict because a judicial gag order remains in place until the penalty phase ends. Defense attorney Jack McMahon talked briefly with reporters about Monday’s outcome.
‘‘The jury worked very, very, very hard. They should be commended,’’ McMahon said, noting that Gosnell was convicted on only three of the original seven murder charges.
Still, McMahon argued that the media had been ‘‘overwhelmingly against’’ Gosnell throughout the trial, and he likened the defense’s case to ‘‘salmon swimming upstream.’’
He said Gosnell said little to him as the verdicts came in Monday, other than to thank him for putting on an aggressive defense. ‘‘How do you prepare anybody for that?’’ McMahon said, adding: ‘‘It’s a very difficult case. There’s a lot of emotion.’’
The case, which has unfolded since early March inside Courtroom 304 here, has garnered national attention and inflamed passions on all sides of the abortion divide.
Antiabortion activists have seized on the macabre details — from Gosnell’s practice of ‘‘snipping’’ the spinal cords of fetuses to the dismembered remains that investigators discovered in milk jugs and glass jars inside his Women’s Medical Society clinic — as a wake-up call about the potential for wider abuse in abortion facilities and the need for stricter oversight.
Antiabortion groups and politicians on Monday said the case underscored what they see as the brutality inherent in abortion procedures.
‘‘Some abortionists may have cleaner sheets than Gosnell, and better sterilized equipment and better trained accomplices, but what they do — what Gosnell did — kill babies and hurt women — is the same,’’ Representative Christopher Smith, Republican of New Jersey,
Abortion rights groups have insisted that Gosnell’s crimes are an anomaly and that the abysmal conditions inside his clinic persisted only because numerous regulators ignored red flags for years.
Such groups also were quick to praise Monday’s conviction, but they warned that restrictive measures being proposed by lawmakers in some states risk driving women to less-reputable abortion providers and cutting off funding to help low-income women afford the procedures.
‘‘We must reject misguided laws that would limit women’s options and force them to seek treatment from criminals like Kermit Gosnell,’’ Eric Ferrero, a spokesman for the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, said in a statement.
Despite the tidal wave of outrage surrounding the trial, Monday’s outcome seems unlikely to shift the public’s positions on abortion.
Views of abortion have remained steady for years, and a recent Gallup poll showed that the Gosnell trial has not altered them.”
By Brady Dennis | WASHINGTON POST | MAY 14, 2013